Sunday, 7 March 2010
A Touch of the Crazies
Is Hollywood running short of ideas, I have to ask? Having recently seen The Wolfman, a remake of an earlier movie by the same name, along comes The Crazies, opening the vaults on George Romero’s 1973 extravaganza. If it looks like a zombie movie, if it feels like a zombie movie and if it sounds like a zombie movie, well, then it is a zombie movie! Yes, we’ve been here before; I’ve been here before.
Is it good; did I enjoy it? Up to a point, yes, I did. Unfortunately I haven’t seen the original so I can make no direct comparison, though I understand that was made on a far leaner budget. But, given the theme, that of loonies on the rampage, there really is only so much one can do with money. It’s a reasonably good story with some nice twists, though there is nothing either new or unexpected. .
Directed by Breck Eisner, The Crazies tells of a small farming town whose water supply has been contaminated by an unknown toxin which has the effect, you guessed it, of turning people crazy, murderously so. In the midst of the mess is Sheriff David Dutton, played by Timothy Olyphant, and his wife, Doctor Judy Dutton, played by Radha Mitchell, are the only two to remain completely sane amongst the neighbour eat neighbour mayhem. I’m not quite sure how, though, unless they refused to touch the local water! Perhaps they only drink the bottled stuff. :-)
It turns out that the toxin is a kind of biological weapon, a virus released by accident when a plane crashed in the nearby lake. But it is so lethally contagious that the military seals off the town, intending, as it turns out, to stop the spread of the infection by exterminating everyone, infected or not.
The Duttons, accompanied by Deputy Sheriff Russell Clank, played by Joe Anderson, who himself starts to get the crazies, attempt an escape through the perimeter erected around the town. Sheriff and wife make it, but the movie concludes on a fairly bleak note. As they approach the city of Cedar Rapids a satellite view of the Earth is shown and the words “initiate contamination protocol”. The whole horror, one surmises, is about to start again, though on a larger scale, with the subliminal message that the real enemy is the state itself; that this is indeed how governments would behave in the face of doomsday.
There are few surprises here but if you like knock-about horror, thrills, spills and gore then this is your movie. There is also a decent amount of black humour, something I particularly enjoy. So, yes, go and see it; just don’t go crazy. :-))
Posted by Anastasia F-B at 11:47
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
thats a crazy review. will check it out ... do you write for a paper? reporting sorta thingie. online-offline?ReplyDelete
This is nothing new, the naughties was a shit decade for film, not helped by the fact the decade is referred to as the naughties in the first place.ReplyDelete
Wikipedia has lists!
It's even more annoying when they don't advertise that they're remakes.
And endless prequels, sequels and franchise reboots.
Bah, why not just leave a good film as it was, why overkill a good series or franchise - they should know when to quit :@. Remake bad films, the nearly films which could have been good but dissapointed, remake those ones to be all they can be. And they should stop remaking foreign films, if people don't want to watch a subtitled film, they won't be encouraged once they see a crap remake of the original in English. But that would be risky, and they want as less risk as possible and will continue to churn out CGI-heavy shite so long as all people want is spectacle, and continue to shamelessly ponce off foreign film industries with bad remakes.
I suppose you could add books to that as well, films are rarely better than books, remakes than originals and sequels than the first - and now obviously, comic books and graphic novels! The American film industry really just meanders between different levels of shitness a lot of the time, and if I didn't have such an appreciation for the "it's so shit it's good" sort of films, I'd probably moan a lot more. A part from certain directors who end up writing and producing their own original films, too many seem to make money just ruining other peoples shit.
Rant over :)). I've never seen this film or the original btw, horrors don't sit too well with me unless they're zombies. My imagination is too vivid and I'll spend the rest of the evening spooking myself out, but I fancy my chances with zombie hordes so may give this one a watch :'D.
Nitin, I've done s spot of student journalism, but that's all. Otherwise I just write for my own pleasure.ReplyDelete
Well, Jimmy, if you go for zombies you should go for this. :-))
I went for Zombieland the other day, Harrelson is the man.ReplyDelete
I must catch up with that.ReplyDelete