Tuesday 23 November 2010

Justice and Imagination


A week last Sunday BBC television started screening of a new series of Garrow’s Law, a legal drama loosely based on the life and career of William Garrow, one of the most significant figures in the history of English common law, the man who is largely responsible for the adversarial court system, the man who coined the phrase ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ I watched the first series too, or as much as I was able, because I find legal drama as beguiling as history. Combine the two and I’m hooked!

Anyway, the episode in question dealt with the Zong case of 1781, in which the master of a trading ship stood accused of jettisoning worthless cargo and then submitting a fraudulent insurance claim for loss of profits. The plea was one of necessity, which the insurance company rejected. Dry stuff, you might think, except the cargo was human beings, African slaves being transported to the sugar plantations of the West Indies. Those who were thrown overboard, a hundred and twenty-two people in all, were mostly women and children.

It just so happened that I had not long finished reading On Reason and Imagination, an essay by William Hazlitt, a leading English radical and contemporary of Garrow’s. I was immediately reminded of the following passage;

…there are enormities to which no words can do adequate justice. Are we then, in order to form a complete idea of them, to omit every circumstance of aggravation, or to suppress every feeling of impatience that arises out of the details, least we should be accused of giving way to the influence of prejudice and passion? This would be to falsify the impression altogether, to misconstrue reason, and to fly in the face of nature. Suppose, for instance, that in the discussions on the Slave-Trade a description to the life was given of the horrors of the Middle Passage (as it was termed), that you saw the manner in which thousands of wretches, year after year, were stowed together in the hold of a slave-ship, without air, without light, without food, without hope, so that what they suffered in reality was brought home to you in imagination, till you felt a sickness of heart as one of them, could it be said that this was a prejudging of the case, that your knowing the extent of the evil disqualified you from pronouncing sentence upon it, and that your disgust and abhorrence were the effect of a heated imagination? No. Those evils that inflame the imagination and make the heart sick, ought not to leave the head cool. This is the very test and measure of the degree of the enormity, that it involuntary staggers and appals the mind.

The deliberate murder of these women and children certainly staggered and appalled my mind. But what staggered it even more is that they were not even considered to be human beings, that the charge was not one of murder, that they were of no more significance than any other cargo. The really horrifying thing is that neither the law at large nor the court on the day was interested in the moral atrocity at the heart of the Zong case; no, it was simply a question of commercial propriety.

We live in an age of atrocity, in the shadow of the Holocaust, the Rwandan Genocide and the Bosnian Massacres. It’s really not possible, then, for me or anyone else to sit in judgement over a more distant past, knowing full-well the kind of things human beings are capable of. Nevertheless, I still found the details of the Zong Affair unsettling for the simple reason that there was a time in England when, in the eyes of the law, certain human beings, merely because of the colour of their skin, had no right to life; that they were merely goods, as disposable as any other goods. This is made all the worse for me because this is a time when Christian belief, a Christian sense of morality, was much more central in daily life than it is today. But in the end justice, morality and even goodness itself are bloodless, self-referring and abstract concepts. Hazlitt was quite right: the understanding of suffering requires a leap of imagination.

19 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Zong case was quite important in this regard, beginning a major change in attitudes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Slavery persists. It was the Atlantic slave trade that was ended by Parliament. Then began the race for Africa and its treasures and the expansion of colonization in South Asia and the Antipodes. Was that morally superior?

    In our time, fashion views the exploitation of black people from Africa as a particular offense against humanity, but slavery - or servitude all but indistinguishable from slavery - has been a constant of human societies from as far back as we can determine. Before the development of machines that could harness the power of wind, water, or steam, human labour was essential for every kind of work that could not be performed by brute animals. But humans are cheaper.

    North America was colonized under land grant permits from European monarchs, but those who held the permits were not inclined to perform the hard labour of clearing forests and tilling land. Their solution for a couple of hundred years was to import the unwanted children and petty criminals of their homelands, indentured to serve a term of years for their masters. Most died within a year or two of arrival. When the Portuguese and Spanish began to import black Africans, and English, French and Dutch colonials followed suit, it was because the Africans were stronger, healthier and better able to survive, not because they were valued less than the street urchins of Europe.

    There is no doubt that slavery and indenture represent clear examples of mankind's capacity to behave callously towards members of its own species, but no group deserves any particular condemnation or has any particular right to claim exceptional virtue.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The movie Amazing Grace is about William Wilberforce and his efforts to end the slave trade in the British Empire. Slavery is an Ancient practice and is still in practice in remote parts of the world. The Europeans and Americans Were looking for cheap labor to maximize profit. The practice displaced a large amount of people from their natural enviroments and has been the cause of wars and racial tensions to this day. Some former American slaves repatriated to Africa and Founded the country of Liberia.In modern times white slavery of women into forced prostitution goes on throughout the world and Goverments do little to stop this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Calvin, ending the slave trade itself was the first step. The abolition of slavery throughout the British Empire, which came in 1833, the second. History always moves by slow degrees.

    I have no arguments with your wider points. Of all human qualities imagination, the capacity to empathise with others, is the most elusive.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ana - yes. But can anyone empathise with suffering, unless it is theirs? I think we only have the capacity to sympathise with the misfortunes of others.
    :-(

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. CI, I would like to think so, like to think it was objectively possible, but I admit that I may be deluding myself.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What if a demon were to creep after you one night, in your loneliest loneliness, and say, 'This life which you live must be lived by you once again and innumerable times more; and every pain and joy and thought and sigh must come again to you, all in the same sequence. The eternal hourglass will again and again be turned and you with it, dust of the dust!' Would you throw yourself down and gnash your teeth and curse that demon? Or would you answer, 'Never have I heard anything more divine'?

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. God has a wicked sense of humour.
    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  16. @ Adam ,you and I must have been really bad chaps the last time around .I live in Hell too, the devil is a woman,I married her.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  18. CI, not something you have discovered recently, I hope. :-)

    ReplyDelete