Monday, 22 August 2011
Ending Moral Nihilism
It’s not often I agree with the Bagehot column in the Economist but today I do, and for good reasons. The recent riots in London were a bit of a jolt, but something positive is emerging in the aftermath of anarchy: there has been a general shift in the popular mood towards the conservative right.
We had thirteen years of New Labour rule in this country, thirteen years of liberalism, political correctness and multi-culturalism. The end result has been not freedom but licence, not harmony but fragmentation. As Bagehot says, in the debate between freedom and order the latter is winning out on several fronts.
An orgy of burning, murder and looting has helped to confirm the Prime Minister’s repeated mantra that ours is a broken society. While the economy still operates a commanding position in most people’s minds, concerns over law and order are beginning to close up fast.
Our police force has been badly mismanaged, as I said in my previous article, with repeated waves of liberalisation reducing its effectiveness as an agent of order. There is nothing more dangerous to peace than a police service that is perceived to be weak; ordinary people loose faith and criminals become bolder. Civil liberty is all very well but not when it is accompanied by laxity and lawlessness.
If you think acts of disorder reflect badly on the ruling government I would urge you to consider a retake. Disorder in itself is not the issue; it’s the way in which the politicians act that’s important, the way in which they respond to the public mood. There is one paragraph where Bagehot really hits home;
…the backlash could extend beyond crime to include welfare and other social issues. The left is imploring the public to consider the underlying causes of the riots. They should be careful what they wish for. Voters might conclude that the deep-seated causes are not poverty, discrimination and austerity – the riots took place in a country whose government currently spends half of its national income – but welfare dependency, broken homes and moral nihilism.
We’ve been here before, of course, we’ve seen moral nihilism at its worst. One need not go as far back as the Gordon Riots of 1780, an episode I mentioned in The Shaming of England; there are the riots of 1981 in the same urban ghettos. Then the political mood of the country shifted decisively to the right, with Margaret Thatcher hugely increasing her Parliamentary majority in the subsequent general election. Consider also the urban and campus riots which blighted America in the late 1960s, which served as an overture for the age of Nixon.
David Cameron, the Prime Minister, has emerged from the burning a little like a phoenix, shining with a new lustre. His green and salad days are gone. At the height of the disorder he described parts of Britain as “not just broken but frankly sick”, going on to call for a “clearer code of values and standards that we expect people to live by”. Yes, indeed, values and standards that were lost in thirteen years of political drift at home, aggressive warfare abroad, all accompanied by the most abject forms of moral decay.
Posted by Anastasia F-B at 15:46
Labels: british politics, david cameron, riots
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
One hopes for the best, but Cameron's record so far is uninspiring.ReplyDelete
I think our society is a bit like the well-known curate's egg. Some of the dodgy bits are the inner cities, 3rd-world migrants and arrogant complacent politicians like Cameron. Nothing that a bit of common sense wouldn't sort out. Sad there isn't much of that about.......ReplyDelete
Calvin, yes, but he has Clegg around his ankle like a ball and chain.ReplyDelete
Michael, I simply have to try to see some positive light. Cameron may not be brilliant but he is the best we have. Just imagine if it had been Heath in charge.ReplyDelete
Soon, like fall of 2011 soon.ReplyDelete
Your commendation of Cameron is, shall I say, rather lukewarm. Until Brown came along I thought Heath was the worst prime minister ever! However, I have reached agreement with Mr Cameron. He doesn't care what I think and I don't care what he says.ReplyDelete
Something I wonder about (since the same thing is certainly going to happen here in the States) is how is our Society (if not our civilization) going to deal with this generation of feral youth? Our "Ruling Class" has taken an entire generation's worth of children and raised them to be an uneducated, undisciplined, unproductive, immoral mob. How do you repair the damage? They are nearly illiterate, so it is almost impossible to teach them, they are shameless, so you can't appeal to their better instincts - so how do you deal with them? Unlike the UK of the 18th Century, we don't have a far-off continent to which they can be tranported.ReplyDelete
Anthony, if only. :-)ReplyDelete
Michael, I understand! Do you read the Spectator? There was a decent article on Cameron by James Forsyth in last week's issue.ReplyDelete
CB, yes, that's such a pity. :-)ReplyDelete
I think you might be interested in my latest piece on Broowaha, the article I headed A Gangster Holiday. Also an earlier piece headed What England Needs is an American Super Cop.
"I have reached agreement with Mr Cameron. He doesn't care what I think and I don't care what he says."ReplyDelete
Nice one, Michael.