Tuesday 7 December 2010

The regrets of Hanoi Jane


There was an interview with Jane Fonda, the daughter of the late Henry Fonda the actor and herself an actor, in one of the glossy Sunday supplements, introducing itself with a picture of her on the front cover. There she is, a seventy-two year old woman, certainly with a reasonable figure, bending over and reaching out to touch her toes as she turns smiling towards the camera, obviously the result of her endless workout routines, allowing her to retain a high degree of suppleness. Indeed, there she is, just below a text saying, You'd be smiling too if you could do this as 72 (and this is just the warm-up). What does she do for a second act, I wonder? Keep reading; you will find out presently.

There are more pictures of her inside, including one closer to her face. The hair is obviously dyed and she has clearly had as many facelifts as some people have breakfasts. She certainly looks younger than her years but this is not youth; this is a grotesque parody of youth, this unnatural, stiff face, devoid of the signals that give people life, expression and feeling. In a bogus search for something beyond her she has lost all dignity, including the dignity of age, the grace of change. She looks good in the way that a three thousand year old Egyptian mummy looks good. But the same picture also shows her hands, the real give away, the hands of a woman in her seventies. Presumably it's beyond the power of even the most skilled cosmetic surgeon to do anything about this, to alter the true signs of advancing time.

She is just a sad old woman trying so hard not to look like a sad old woman. Oh, what a catty thing to say. I simply can't help myself. I'm not particularly interested in Jane Fonda, or so much of the celebrity ephemera that appears in the supplements. I simply glance through them, usually never reading the articles in question. Fonda, along with so many others of the Hollywood set, can spend as much money as they wish looking for eternal youth. But there was one other picture that made me pause and take this unserious person seriously. It was a picture of her in Hanoi in 1972 during the Vietnam War, a picture of her posing by the side of a manned anti-aircraft gun, sitting, looking as if she is taking part in the action. There she is - Hanoi Jane.

I simply do not comprehend treason, comprehend those who side with foreign powers and foreign ideologies. Fonda thought the Vietnam War was wrong. I do, too; I believe it was a noble cause fought for the wrong reasons, based on a series of mistaken assumptions. If I had been American and alive at the time I might have argued against it, as I argued in my schooldays against the Second Iraq War, but I would never, no matter what, have taken the Baghdad Step, or the Hanoi Step, in the case of Jane. I could never do or say anything that would go against the fundamental interests of my country.

Not so Jane. When she went to Hanoi she denounced the leaders of the United States as 'war criminals.' Then came that infamous pose, looking as if she was helping shoot down American planes. This is no naive youth; she was in her early thirties at the time. She was asked in the interview if she regretted anything in her life. The stock response came immediately;

I regret one thing: I regret sitting on an anti-aircraft gun and I will go to my grave regretting that...I take responsibility for my actions. I wasn't thinking. Going to North Vietnam was no big deal, but being photographed like that changed everything. I will pay for it for the rest of my life and deservedly so because it was a terrible thing. Terrible thing.

I suppose I should commend her for her honesty but I can see only the treason and only the traitor. There are some things that are simply beyond forgiveness. After all these years she has still not been forgiven by some, those who also went to Vietnam, though under less luxurious circumstances. During a recent book tour Fonda was spat upon by one of those people, one of those little people, one of the people presumably whose scars are more than skin deep. I can understand because I have met people in Georgia, men who went to Vietnam as boys, much younger than me now, who were spat upon on their less than glorious return, accused of being 'baby killers'.

But Jane regrets, at least some things she regrets, regrets, I suspect, the negative impact this had on her career. Some things, I say, because she does not regret broadcasting on Radio Hanoi. Tokyo Rose or Hanoi Jane, what’s the difference? Treachery always seems to have the same face, no matter how tight the skin is pulled.

33 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No bans, thank you very much. There have been bans and interdicts enough.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. People who achieve great success through birth or luck trend lefty as a form of penance.

    That's why Goldman Sachs partners have historically been huge Democrat donors. That's why 90%+ of movie stars are silver spoon socialists. They remember being sick-in-the-stomach green trainee traders or waiting tables in Hollywood and feel overwhelming guilt for the blind luck that made them.

    By contrast, small businessmen who had to prize their wealth out of unforgiving dirt, one nickel at a time, are Thatcherite/Tea-Party to their bones.

    I don't see that latter quality in Cameron or any of his wretched rabble of squishy wets.
    They're no better or worse than Jane - they just haven't had the right photo-opportunity yet.

    ReplyDelete
  7. She Was quite young at the time and there were consequences for her actions. Back in the Day, she was smokin Hot in the 1968 film "Barbarella"

    ReplyDelete
  8. Adam, I'm opposed to bans, all bans and prohibitions, is that not clear? I'm opposed to anything that restricts the liberty of the subject. I have no wish at all to stop plastic surgery. I'm not at all sure what gave you the idea that I was. People can waste their money on this if they wish; it's their money. Once I start thinking about banning things I shall turn to Tony Blair for advice. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. SuciƓ, I do not expect to see David Cameron in Teheran any day soon. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. War after war after war after war?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sorry, I missed your question; I really am quite tired. My view of cosmetic surgery is made plain in this post. I have no moral position here; it's simply a question of taste

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Is it illegal in England to clip dogs ears or dock their tails ?

    ReplyDelete
  16. I hope you have no such regrets at 72, Ana. Youthful passion and enthusiasm coupled with an open innocence of manipulative corruptors has led many of us to do or say things we later perceived differently.

    That decade was a time of turmoil and chaos in America on a scale hard to imagine today. A corrupt US government was shipping tens of thousands of draftees to kill and be killed in order to support a corrupt South Vietnamese regime. Untold numbers of Vietnamese - North and South - were being slaughtered for a cause no one in the Administration could clearly explain. Civil rights struggles were fought out in the streets of major US cities as the very politicians who declared we must sacrifice an untold number of young Americans for "freedom" overseas were denying freedom to people at home. The media and many college campuses were riddled with communist propagandists using the rhetoric of social revolution to sow confusion and further the Kremlin's aims. The nightly news was full of slaughter, starvation, horror, platitudes and lies: lies of the Left and lies of the Right. It wasn't clear at the time whose lies were worse. It was hard not to be angry, to want to DO something.

    Communist propaganda characterized the Vietnam War as a struggle for liberation from colonial oppression - a peasant David v. a capitalist Goliath; sharpened bamboo spears against B52 bombers. Not even the major media clearly understood the vast amount of sophisticated weaponry flooding into the North from Russia, or that Russian pilots were flying those MiGs against the US Phantoms and Intruders. No one properly characterized the NVA as the world's 4th largest Army (after the US, USSR, and Red China). Those who spoke of North Vietnam's two million murdered landowners were ignored.

    Nowhere was more stuffed with Red sympathizers than Europe's arty pseudo-intellectual set. Fonda married and was exploited by Roger Vadim from 1965-1973. It's no surprise to see her aping the beliefs of his milieu. Jane Fonda's visit to North Vietnam was stupid, ill-informed, and politically naive. I do not think she had any idea she was doing anything more than expressing her personal views about an unpopular war - something every American was entitled to do. The political impact, was, of course, negligible. The media impact was something else again.

    Forty years on, I think Fonda understands and genuinely regrets the way her actions were interpreted and exploited. I think she probably has a completely different view of the moral issues surrounding the Vietnam war. I think her public change of heart is worthy of respect, just as her original error was worthy of scorn. I think many of us are lucky our follies have been far less notorious.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anthony, I don't know about ear clipping but tail docking is still allowed, I think. Put it this way: I've never seen the boxer breed with a tail.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Calvin, life is full of regrets, I have some even now, but I sincerely hope I never have one as big as hers. Perhaps I am being ungenerous, perhaps she does feel genuine remorse. It's just that the words she uses in this interview and elsewhere seem artificial, not at all spontaneous, like a well-rehearsed script.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Well rehearsed? Perhaps - but I'm sure she she has been asked to revisit that faux pas many, many times. Journalists are such imitative creatures and much prefer parasitizing each other to original thinking.

    Oddly enough, as I type this, Ted Turner is on The Weather Channel (now owned by NBC).

    ReplyDelete
  24. @ Calvin: You have stated much very well. The vacuum that was left by the defeat of French colonialist (rubber plantations and such)was what the US was trying to fill.Have you seen the location of the Gulf of Tonkin on a world map? It was a threat to American security? Ho Chi Minh should have been president of a united Vietnam as the US had good relations with him in WW2. Now Vietnam is reunited and South East asia did not fall to Communism (The Domino Theory) It was Vietnam who interviened in the Cambodia genocide as the rest of the word did nothing. Most of the present day population of VN were not born untill after the war. The US is reestablishing relations and commerce with them in a move to counter Chinese expansionism. There is a proposition to help them build a nuclear reactor and you know what that will lead to.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Adam, thank you. This is clearly something you've thought a lot about. You have views and proposals here that I would not support in any way. More than that, when people start using a word like 'breeding' in relation to human beings - who are superior to animals, at least some are -I'm overcome with feelings of distaste.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Calvin, originality is a precious commodity. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Adam:Sounds like you are getting with the program, Nazi Eugenics, selective breeding.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Hanoi Jane...as a veteran of Vietnam, I find her regrets to fall in the category of "too little, too late". She may go to her grave regretting her actions; I'll go to mine hating her traitorous guts.

    ReplyDelete
  30. When I was a student in the 1960s, we had this Vietnam War exhibition in the student union. It was all photos, typical caption: "Vietcong heroine who singlehandedly bayoneted a GI to death". I found it appalling then, and I find it appalling now. No doubt the woman acted heroically, but what about the poor GI? The tragedy is that he probably didn't want to be there in the first place.

    I always thought that Jane Fonda was overrated, politically, dramatically and sexually, which is probably why I have no moral position on her conduct during the war. I loved the Egyptian mummy simile.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Dennis, thanks for this information and a very big welcome to the land of the Imp. :-)

    ReplyDelete