The law is an ass, an idiot, so said Charles Dickens’ Mister
Bumble the Beadle in Oliver Twist. I think we can maybe refine that just
a little: it’s not the law that is an ass and an idiot but Lord Justice
Leveson, who last week produced his report recommending, as anticipated,
statutory regulation of the press.
His conclusion has been welcomed by other asses, not least
of whom is Nick Clegg, the Limp Dumb Deputy Prime Minister, a man who could
play Bottom the Weaver in A Midsummer Night’s Dream with no need for the ears.
David Cameron, now twisting on the horns of yet another
dilemma, only has himself to blame for his discomfort. There was no need,
as I have said, for this expensive farce in the first place. Breaches of the
law by journalists in News International should have been dealt with as
breaches of the law, nothing more. Instead we have this stupid lawyer and
his equally stupid acolytes mounting a challenge to press freedom, a freedom
upon which all others might be said to hang.
What irony there is here. Our democracy is dying
anyway, hurried along to extinction by the European politburo in Brussels . Now if
Leveson has his way we can forget about Milton and Wilkes and Orwell; we can
forget about all those who defended a free press as an essential adjutant to free
speech. State regulation is the beginning of the end.
It’s gratifying to see that not all in the present
government are as terminally stupid as the insufferable Corporal Clegg.
William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, warned Cameron that statutory press
regulation would be warmly welcomed by Vladimir Putin and other petty tyrants
around the globe. According to one insider, Hague said that “…Britain
demonstrating that we have a free press is part of our ability to say that we
believe in democracy…if we announced statutory regulation this would be used by
the Russians to justify all sorts of behaviour. It is a fundamental part
of British foreign policy to have a free press.”
It’s a point of view echoed by Jethro Goko of the Daily
News, Zimbabwe ’s
biggest independent newspaper. He said that the rest of the world looked
to Britain
as a model of press freedom and that the phone hacking scandal should not be
used as an excuse for government interference. If Leveson has his way it
will be “manna from heaven” for the likes of Robert Mugabe and his kind.
Goko should know. His own paper was shut down for seven years and only
publishes now under state licence.
Here the Spectator, my favourite political weekly, has
openly announced in the latest issue that it will not cooperate with any
regulatory structure mandated by the state. Fraser Nelson, the editor,
writes that the publication will not attend meetings, pay fines or heed
menaces.
“To do so would be to betray everything The Spectator has
stood for since 1828.” So far as he is concerned Leveson is a
no-brainer. “…our archives [show] how we have been implacably opposed to
the principle of state regulation of the press – not because it protects the
press, but because it protects the public.” He added that the magazine has a
long history of standing up to politicians who want to restrict freedom of
speech.
When I think of Leveson I think of one of those antediluvian
fossils, the old judges who sit on the bench regularly having to seek
enlightenment as lawyers present their cases because there is some aspect of
modern life that they do not understand, from Wi-Fi to iPhones. Leveson
does not understand the internet. A mere twelve of his almost two
thousand page tome is devoted to its place in modern life.
His is a scheme that is effectively twenty years or so out
of date, completely ignoring the fact that more and more people get their news
from the net, not from newspapers. The Sun pointed out the absurdity
here, saying that it and other papers could be stopped from publishing stories
and pictures already seen by millions online.
A gagged press is a dead press. With circulation
already in sharp decline I’m guessing that in twenty years or so we will no
longer have published newspapers, the so-called ‘qualities’ like the Guardian
being the first dinosaurs into Jurassic extinction. Let its ridiculous
editor reflect on that as defends Leveson’s attempt to “ensure decent
standards.”
Publish and be damned. Be damned to state control of
the press; be damned to Lord Leveson
Public enquiries are almost invariably held to suppress truth, not reveal it.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad Cameron and Hague have opposed Leveson's idiotic suggestions. Charles Utley became quite exercised about them, and pointed out Leveson is typical of a certain kind of modern jurist who simply loves regulations and sees them as a panacea.
The Grauniad, of course, favours any enhancement to the State. The Speccie deserves a big boost in subscriptions, and if it makes liberty the heart of its message, might well get them.
Will you be commenting on the Rotherham swing?
Thanks, Calvin. Yes, I think I should. Keep watching. :-)
DeleteWith papers sales being low, and getting lower, I note the imminent arrival of regulation of the internet as well.
ReplyDeleteHmmm.
One might thing that the powers that be want to do what they do, without the public being told that they do "it".
Regulation of the press seems to me to be regulation of the amount of truth available.
Orwell!, thou shouldst be living at this hour: England hath need of thee. :-)
DeleteThe press is increasingly irrelevant, Ana, and hasn't been free for a very long time - except to carry out the wishes of its agenda-driven owners. Freedom of the press would be nice, but I'd settle for 'freedom from the press'.
ReplyDeleteEkalder, I know the Murdoch stable can be awfully close to the owner at times but even they, especially The Times, often walk an independent road. The foreign news coverage of the latter is particularly good and I for one would miss it if it was gone.
Deletekeep watch over your liberties; equally important is that they are not abused as to give purpose to those who would curtail them.
ReplyDeleteVery well said, Anthony.
Delete