When you see a beautiful woman, what do your thoughts turn
to? This was a question posed on Blog Catalogue. It wasn’t
about the obvious; it wasn’t about sex: it was about aesthetics.
I didn’t bother answering because it was chiefly
directed at men. But my thoughts immediately did turn, as the poster put
it, to the Beauty of a Woman. For some wholly unexplained reason they
turned to Girl with a Pearl Earring, both the painting by Johannes Vermeer and
the 2003 movie staring Scarlett Johansson and Colin Firth. For me the one
complimented the other perfectly, a depiction of peerless beauty inside a
seductive enigma.
I saw the painting several years ago in the Mauritshuis
Gallery in The Hague .
I was completely beguiled by the look of the subject, the way she stares out,
the way she stares inside. Girl with a Pearl Earring is sometimes referred
to as the Mona Lisa of the North, though I find her far more mysterious and
captivating than the Mona Liza of the South.
The truth is we know next to nothing about Vermeer, who
spent his whole working life in the Dutch town of Delft . If we know next to nothing about
him we know nothing at all about his subjects. We know nothing about this
girl, other than what she conveys by expression alone. Who was she, this
image of perfection, where did she come from? Was she a member of the
artist’s own family, the wife of a patron, or was she, perhaps, simply a
household servant?
These questions are unanswerable. But into the mystery
came Tracy Chevalier, who spun a story around this head. To this story
came movie director Peter Webber, who turned a painting and a novel into a
cinematic masterpiece, an artistic hymn to beauty and to painting.
I haven’t read the novel, though I’m told it’s very
good. In a way I’m glad because the film, which I saw a month or so ago
on BBC iPlayer, depends more on image and mood than words. The dialogue
is wonderfully understated, so much depending, like the painting itself, on
look. Scarlett Johansson might have been born to play this part, not just
because she a good actress, not just because she is strikingly beautiful, but
because she could very well be the Girl herself, come to life but carrying the
enigma with her.
Everything about this film for me was perfection -
perfection in character, perfection in setting, perfection in mood and
perfection in image. Axel Ruger, the curator of Dutch art at London ’s National
Gallery, quite rightly said that it takes the atmosphere and some of the
pictorial conventions of the seventeenth century and translates them into
cinematic language. It is, in other words, a moving image of the still
painting.
The premise of the movie, the premise of Chevalier’s book,
is based on a supposition – what if Vermeer had been inspired by the beauty of
a maid who came to the household to create one of his greatest
masterpieces? And thus it is. Johansson comes as Griet, a girl from
a dignified but impoverished Protestant family to serve with the Catholic
Vermeers.
To begin with the artist pays her little mind, isolating
himself in his studio, not just to concentrate on his work but to get away from
the demands of everyday domestic life. It’s only after Griet, who moves
around bullied and mostly wordless, is given the task of cleaning the studio
that she becomes an object of interest owing to her sensitivity towards light
and colour. She is not just an object of interest to the artist, helping
him mix his paint, but an object of desire to Van Ruijven (Tom Wilkinson), his
wealthy but boorish patron. When he fails to possess to possess Griet
physically he decides to possess her physically!
A portrait is duly commissioned, a work in progress, hidden
away from Vermeer’s self-pitying and jealous wife (Essie Davis). There is
a wonderful wordless frisson between Griet and Vermeer, lots of smouldering
sexual tension all the greater because it is so understated. That
consummation when he finally pins the pearl on Griet’s ear is simply breathtaking,
virginal, symbolic and erotic, far in excess of any obvious physical act.
It’s a moment of perfection, in beauty, in desire and in longing, captured
forever. It’s a perfect tribute to perfection.
I have the DVD. Beauty - in the eye and perception of the beholder.
ReplyDeleteI wonder, Anthony. I think true beauty is transcendental.
DeletePerhaps so but not everyone is aware or shares opinions?
DeleteI suppose that's true.
DeleteVery good post ... A Tribute to Perfection.
ReplyDeleteA nice portrait and an unknown painter.
Hugs.
Merry Christmas!
Thanks, Pedro. Hugs back and feliz navidad. :-)
DeleteYou often wax lyrical about art and literature which I never comment upon because they are intellectually far above my pay grade. However I should like to say that I enjoy reading them very much.
ReplyDeleteIt delights me to to have kind and informative readers like you, Antisthenes. You do yourself a disservice. :-)
DeleteAna Vermeer was an utterly brillint artist. Another great post by you.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Richard. Yes, he was a wonderful artist, one of my favourites.
DeleteVernacular art has a power to reach across time and space and touch us in a way religious and mythological subjects cannot.
ReplyDeleteParticularly when it carries its own myth and mystery.
DeleteThis is still a movie I need to see, but I can always relate to the concepts of beauty and something to long for, the line between blurs yet is still there none-the-less. Just glad I could inspire such a nicely written post about what has to be a great movie and book. *nod*
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you're glad. :-)
DeleteThese have truly lived for their art whose work remains and of whose lives and interests we know nothing or close to nothing. It is something Keats longed for and couldn't have, those few who are so privileged become their art and the art becomes a commentary on their lives.
ReplyDeleteI think that must be close to a perfect state of being, Rehan.
Delete'I want! I want!' William Blake. (1793).
ReplyDeleteI love that image. :-)
Delete