Do you have a definition of abject cowardice? I do,
one that I recently acquired. A coward is a man who walks on to a school
bus, full of children, and shoots a fourteen-year-old girl twice at close
range, in the leg and more critically in the head. The girl in question
was guilty of a dire crime: she believes that education is a fundamental right
for all. This was enough to mark her as a target for assassination by the
Pakistani Taliban.
I was a bit out of the loop so far as news was concerned
when I was in Tunisia .
But the one item that gripped my attention in early October was a report I saw
on the BBC World Service concerning the attempted murder of Malala Yousafazi
by a Taliban hitman, principally because she was an active campaigner for
schooling for girls which, by their perverted lights, was ‘un-Islamic.’
Malala – her name means ‘grief stricken’ – has been active
in her cause since the age of eleven. It was then she began to write a
blog for BBC Urdu, detailing what life was like after the Taliban took control
of her native Swat Valley in Pakistan . Her principal fear
was over the future of her education – “I was afraid of going to school because
the Taliban had issued an edict banning all girls from schools.”
The Taliban, it has to be said, was allowed to consolidate
its position in Swat in an act of retreat and appeasement by the Pakistani
government, which hoped thereby to stop the spread of the cancer. For
several months, before they were finally ousted by the army in the summer of 2009,
these religious fanatics established their own republic of Islamic virtue, the
stuff of nightmares by any reasonable standard. Men were forced to grow
beards and women to wear burqas. Those who did not comply faced lashing
or beheading. The brutish regime also closed schools, the majority of
them for girls.
After the Taliban’s removal Malala appeared on national
television to talk about girls’ education. Her courage in speaking
against the Taliban was enough for the Pakistani government to select her as
a fitting recipient of the country’s first National Peace Award for
Youth. But it also singled her out in another way. At the beginning
of this year she was placed on a Taliban hit list.
That would terrify anyone, particularly a teenager; it would
certainly have terrified me. But Malala would not be silenced by fear.
“Sometimes I imagine I’m going along and the Taliban stop me”, she said on
television, “I take my sandal and hit them in the face and say, ‘What you are
doing is wrong. Education is our right, don’t take it away from
us.’ There is this quality in me – I’m ready for all situations. So
even if (God let this not happen) they kill me, I’ll first say to them, ‘What
you are doing is wrong.’”
Her shooting caused widespread outrage, in Pakistan and
across much of the world. How could it not? How could it not given
the callousness of the action, given her youth and given the cause for which
she was prepared to risk her life? Even countries with the most dubious
record on human rights recognise the importance of universal education.
I’m almost tempted to say that girls’ schooling is no more of a ‘right’ than
breathing; it’s a reflex.
It’s impossible to breath under the Taliban. These
disciples of Iblis have blown up Sufi shrines, worshipers at mosques, and men
and women in markets. Bombs have been planted to ensure maximum loss of
life. Then there is murder incorporated, the assassination of specific
individuals. Public officials and journalists have been targeted but so,
too, have religious scholars belonging to Muslim sects the movement has
condemned as heretical.
Malala was singled out because her campaign for educational
rights was an ‘obscenity’, so said Ehsanullah Ehsan, a Taliban spokesman.
Greater poverty of spirit, greater ignorance, I find almost impossible to
imagine. These are people who kill in the name of God knowing nothing of
God. Is there any greater heresy, I have to ask? There is obscenity
alright, the obscenity of the Ehsanullah Ehsan and his debased kind.
Of all the dark forces in the world the Taliban is among the
darkest, deep in evil and ignorance. To paraphrase some words of Sir
Winston Churchill’s, if the movement succeeds all that we have known and cared
for will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps
more protracted, by the lights of perverted faith.
How very sad, more BO!
ReplyDeleteJust awful, Anthony.
DeleteI have to say that when I heard this story only one word came to mind:
ReplyDeleteSCUM!
Oh, Dennis, I don't think I've ever felt so angry over a news item.
DeleteAs a man of religion, and head of a spiritual community of followers who have faced a century of persecution, terror and cruelty, I most strongly condemn all acts and forms of terrorism because it is my deeply rooted belief that not only Islam but also no true religion, whatever its name, can sanction violence and the bloodshed of innocent men, women and children in the name of God.
ReplyDeleteGod is love, God is peace!
Love can never beget hatred,
and peace can never lead to war.
(Hadhrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad - Khalifatul Masih IV. Murder In The Name of Allah. The Lutterworth Press, 1989).
Wonderful sentiments, Rehan.
Deletemore accurately, the lights of a perverted people; there is no faith which encourages such an act
ReplyDeleteYes, Lama, that's true, but perverted people create a perverted faith. It's not Islam that's at fault here; it's a corruption of Islam.
DeleteHave you really read the OLD TESTAMENT? or the Talmud? they are full of all kinds of perversion.
DeleteI hear that there is a move to nominate her for the Nobel Peace Prize. I think she would just about equal, if not exceed, the likes of Obama and Arafat in moral stature.
ReplyDeleteReally? I must look into this. Thanks, David.
Delete