MacKaskill, the Law's Ass |
Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the only man ever convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, one of the worst acts of mass murder in British history, died earlier this month at his home in
It was a decision taken, I understand, on the 'best medical advice' available at the time. This goes to prove one thing: the Libyan medical service is clearly ten times better than that of Scotland , a point made by Douglas Murray in the latest issue of magazine Prospect. So, if you are unfortunate enough to take ill on your travels just hope that you end up in North Africa rather than North Britain !
Who could possibly forget MacAskill's mawkish and lachrymose words when he announced his intention to release Megrahi? Apparently he does not believe in God but that did nothing to stop him descending into a symphony of metaphysical hogwash;
Mr Al Megrahi now faces a sentence imposed by a higher power. It is one that no court, in any jurisdiction, in any land, could revoke or overrule. It is terminal, final and irrevocable. He is going to die.
Yes, said God, you are all going to die, but I’ll show you Mr MacAskill – the end is not yet! It was three years of embarrassment for Alex Salmond's Scottish National Party administration until Megrahi finally did the decent thing and shuffled off this mortal coil. There is a legacy here that has made the Scots’ legal system look more than usually ridiculous, though the SNP has suffered no adverse electoral consequences.
MacAskill and Salmond, after the decision was taken to release a man responsible for the deaths of no fewer than 270 people, the majority of them American, went on to lecture the world on humanity and compassion, seemingly the 'defining characteristic' of the Scottish people. Personally I can only take cant in very small doses, though the Scots seem to swallow it in abundance, along with whisky.
There is something else. The release was granted on condition that al-Megrahi drop a pending appeal, though why the two should have been married, knowing nothing of Scots law, I don’t quite understand. Is it perhaps that there was a greater danger here, that the thinness of the evidence on which Megrahi was convicted would have held up the Scottish system of justice to even greater ridicule?
I think it will take years for all the issues here to come to light, indeed if they ever do. They may very well be submerged forever in a newly independent Scotland , secure in its self-righteous and hypocritical 'humanity.' When the news of Megrahi's death was released Salmond said that the first thing we should remember is the victims of Lockerbie. The victims here include the American families who lost their relatives, portrayed at the time when Scotland was wallowing in its unique sense of ‘humanity’ as unreflective and vengeful. Yes, vengeful, simply because they wanted justice; they spoke for the dead when nobody else would, certainly not those hypocritical humanists MacAskill and Salmond.
I know Americans are found of Scotland; I know many Americans, including some close personal friends of mine, are of Scots-Irish ancestry, but this should not blind people to the fact that Lockerbie victims were victims twice - first of Megrahi and the Libyan security service, and second of the government of Alex Salmond. Now he remembers the dead whereas previously he has used them for petty nationalist ends.
Like Douglas Murray, I sincerely hope that Americans will not forget this. If you want an insight into the conceited, self-regard of people like MacAskill and Salmond and their ‘unique values’ I would suggest that you could do no better than turn to the poetry of Robert Burns. I'm thinking specifically of a few lines from Holy Willie's Prayer;
Lord, bless Your chosen in this place,
For here You have a chosen race!
But God confound their stubborn face
And blast their name,
Who bring Your elders to disgrace
And open shame!
For here You have a chosen race!
But God confound their stubborn face
And blast their name,
Who bring Your elders to disgrace
And open shame!
Bollocks! Al Megrahi was released under pressure from British petroleum in order to secure a twenty billion pound offshore oil contract with Libya.
ReplyDeleteAnthony, this is from an article I wrote two years ago for the Daily Telegraph website:
DeleteLast year I was of the opinion that there was some kind of collusion between the British and the Scottish governments, based on a desire to secure oil and gas deals with Gaddafi. That was certainly what Blair was aiming for in the Prisoner Transfer Agreement, based on fatuous general principles when it could only ever apply to one person - Megrahi. But the Scots rejected that route, going instead for ‘compassion’ and then proceeded to preach to the rest of the world about their unique values of ‘compassion’, something Salmond is still going on about. These people are naïve and stupid; they are not conspirators.
Do you really think that they would publicly acknowledge the truth ?
DeleteNo, I don't.
DeleteI think the appeal was dangerous to those who know the truth about PanAm 103.
ReplyDeleteIndeed so, Calvin.
Delete