
I bought the New Statesman on Friday, specifically to read Ted Hughes’ Last Letter, a previously unpublished poem on the suicide in 1963 of Sylvia Plath, his first wife and another poet of genius. It’s the final piece, the coda to Birthday Letters, the wonderful anthology that charts the course of his relationship with Sylvia, which demonstrates, if any demonstration was needed, that the course of true love never did run smooth.
I don’t often buy the New Statesman but when I do there are usually plenty left in the newsagent, even in the middle of the week. On Friday, only the day after publication, my copy was the last on the shelves, a sign, I take it, of the love people have of poetry and the fascination they have for the story of Ted and Sylvia. I score high on both counts. I’m moved by the poetry and touched by the tragedy: that Sylvia, full of talent and promise never to be realised, took her life when she was only thirty years old.
Hughes lived with the tragedy, haunted by it for the remainder of his life. There is no more certain evidence than Birthday Letters, published only a few months before his death. Struggling with his own torments, he had to cope with the dreadful feminist harridans, particularly strong in America, who held him personally responsible for Plath’s suicide, people who went so far as to chip his name off her grave.
Last Letter is a deeply personal statement. I’m really not at all surprised that it remained unpublished during his lifetime. It’s a story of a lost weekend, those crucial hours in which death was invited, banished and returned. In writing this I’m finding it difficult to reach out for the right words, to say just how moved I was. As Hughes took the story to its climax my tears began to blind me to the words;
At what position of the hands on my watch-face
Did your last attempt,
Already deeply past
My being able to hear it, shake the pillow
Of that empty bed? A last time
Lightly touch at my books, and my papers?
By the time I got there the phone was asleep.
The pillow innocent. My room slept,
Already filled with snowlit morning light.
I lit my fire. I had got out my papers.
And I had already started to write when the telephone
Jerked awake, in a jabbering alarm,
Remembering everything. It recovered in my hand.
Then a voice like a selected weapon
Or a measured injection,
Coolly delivered its four words
Deeply into my ear: “Your wife is dead.”
It’s unforgettable; I’ll never forget this. Writing in the Observer Robert McCrum rightly said that Hughes has become the once and future king of the English literary imagination, that he is emerging as one of the towering literary figures of the past century, along with Eliot, Yeats, Auden and Larkin. Ann Duffy, the present Poet Laureate, a position once held by Hughes, says that Last Letter is a bit like looking into the sun as it is dying, that it seems to touch a deeper and darker place than any poem he’s ever written. Lady Lazarus can rest content












I'm ambivalent about Hughes. Brit Lit has been such a cosy little gang for more than half a century now. It seems like a thousand years ago I read Crow. Is it poetry or condensed prose? And this piece is still all about him, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteMaybe a fitting tribute would be a Sylvia Plath haiku contest?
ReplyDeleteSylvia is gone,
Head in the o-ven,
Should have bought an Electra.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteCalvin, this is just the conclusion, the crescendo, to a deeply moving, intensely personal piece; each word fits perfectly into the overall mood. It is about him and it's about so much more. I don't share your feelings about British literature but taste is always an important consideration in these matters.
ReplyDeleteOn the question of taste, Sucio, thanks for confirming how cold the haiku form leaves me!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Adam. Sorry to hear that you've had a bad day.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Ana.....oh and on a lighter note....
ReplyDeleteIn the name of the deified Herman von Rompouy, I hereby issue a European Arrest Warrant for Anastasia Fitzgerald-Beaumont for publicly disparaging the preferred poem style of Dear Leader. There shall be no trial, but instead Jose Manuel Baroso shall be charged with pelting the guilty with several thousand damp rags...just after the audit of EU finance is finished....
Hardly anyone ever agrees with me, Ana. I'm accustomed to that.
ReplyDeleteIt's not that I dislike Hughes, it's just that reading his stuff makes me feel like I'm rowing up a quiet backwater, while the mighty river of Art glides powerfully on further and further away.
Today, we look back at the creative output of the 19th century with a very different sensibility to those who were immersed in it. I think the same shift in appreciation may affect the icons of the 20th C.
Adam, I better take the first flight to Havana then. :-)
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteCalvin, don't be concerned; I know the feeling! I rather like backwaters, which is precisely why I wallow in the shallows of English literature. :-) As always time is the only true test in such matters. Let's make a date. Come back this way in, oh, let's say fifty years from today. Then you and I can discuss the merits of Hughes. :-)
ReplyDeleteI'll do my best. But I'm likely to be a bit desiccated by then.
ReplyDeleteAs will I, Calvin. :-)
ReplyDelete'Last Letter' comes uncannily close to '18 Rugby Street' where he names Susan Alliston -
ReplyDeleteand not Assia - as the woman who was keeping him away from the telephone on the nights when Sylvia repeatedly called him and needed him most.
(Koren, Yehuda & Negev, Eilat. A Lover of Unreason. Robson Books, 2006. 115, 116).
One ought, of course, to deal with the poetry and not the life but it is such a compelling story that it is hard sometimes not to get involved - It is also a challenge for those who dispute the confessional and therapeutic values of poetry. There is a Tony Harrison poem called 'Confessional Poetry' worth reading in this regard I'll post in a bit.
Those who disagree with Hughes' style or with free verse per se have obviously not read him much nor tasted good free verse. Auden said it was more difficult to write than formal verse and I agree. One has to start from scratch like Robinson Crusoe on his island rather than having already a skeleton or map on which to build a poem upon. Personally, I prefer formal verse myself on the principle that the rhythm in my heart is, to say the least, not free. Though in recent years my style has changed radically from formal to free verse which takes me 10 times longer to write as well!
Those Hughes-haters (they are not really Plathians nor really feminists) ought to remember that in the last known letters by Sylvia mailed (on 4 February 1963 to her mother, Marcia Brown Stern, and some others) the name on the return/senders address reads 'Sylvia Hughes'.
I left it for a few days till I was in the right mood for reading 'Last Letter' then read it in bed by the light of my phone. One can understand quite clearly why Hughes chose not to include it in Birthday Letters or Howls & Whispers (a limited edition of poem Hughes considered too raw for inclusion in Birthday Letters). Incidentally, in 1990, he published Capriccio, a volume of 20 poems which revolved around Assia Wevill.
Birthday Letters is by far my favourite Hughes book of poems. I usually read it alongside Capriccio and Howls & Whispers. Hughes is emerging as one of the greatest writers of the twentieth century. He was far ahead of his time, not only as a writer but as an eco-warrior. His tome Shakespeare & the Goddess of Complete Being is a true masterpiece. For me, it is the best book on Shakespeare. Hitting at what exactly, made him tick, the tap-root. He did a similar study of Coleridge called 'The Snake in the Oak' which is in his selected prose book Winter Pollen. Here is that Harrison poem:
for Jeffrey Wainwright
When Milton sees his 'late espoused saint'
are we sure the ghost's wife 1 or 2?
Does knowing it's himself beneath the paint
make the Rembrandts truer or less true?
But your father was a simple working man,
they'll say, and didn't speak in those full rhymes.
His words when they came would scarcely scan.
Mi dad's did scan, like yours do, many times!
That quarrel then in Book Ends II between
one you still go on addressing as 'mi dad'
and you, your father comes across as mean
but weren't the taunts you flung back just as bad?
We had a bitter quarrel in our cups
and there were words between us, yes,
I'm guilty, and the way I make it up 's
in poetry, and that much I confess.
That's tremendous. Thanks, Rehan. I agree absolutely about Hughes.
ReplyDelete