Thursday, 4 March 2010

Health n Safety warns against reading this blog

In commenting on the European Union, on the absurdity of the European Union, I said on a recent blog that I was going to see Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland because I wanted to know what a sane world looked like. Yes, it was a joke, a snappy, glib comment. But seriously, looking at things as they are, the madder they seem to become, the madder reality becomes, the reality of our politically correct world, governed by such things as Health n Safety.

Health n Safety, yes, is there anything more maddening than Health n Safety? I’m sure people will be mindful of the story reported last month of the car that plunged into the Rive Avon, leaving a five year old girl trapped inside while police officers stood by, prevented from an attempted rescue by safety regulations. It took ninety-seven minutes before a diving team arrived and another twelve minutes to pull her free. The little girl died later in hospital.

I offer no further comment here other than to say it’s tragic, the delays were tragic, and I fell certain that the police officers who witnessed this must be fully aware of the depth of the tragedy.

Now comes another tale of Health n Safety, this time from Scotland. Last July Alison Hume, a solicitor and mother of two, fell sixty feet down a disused mine shaft near her home in Galston, Ayrshire. The Fire Brigade was called but refused to intervene. Why? Because a memo issued four months earlier banned the use of rope equipment for lifting members of the public to safety. Instead they stood by and waited for six hours for a mountain recue team to arrive. In the meantime Mrs Hume could be heard moaning at the bottom of the shaft, growing quieter as time passed. Soon after she was lifted out she suffered a heart attack and died.

All of these details came out earlier this week in an inquest into her death. During this a senior fire officer admitted that it would have been possible for the crew on the scene to recue Mrs Hume but for the memo, and that all eighteen fire officers present were trained and capable of using the rope equipment. But Health n Safety intervened and this unfortunate woman was allowed to die a slow and lingering death. Of this Murdo Fraser, the Scottish Tory deputy leader, has said:

Of course, the safety of rescue workers has to be a major consideration. But a strict adherence to health and safety rules in such circumstances should not prevent life-saving action.

I just wonder what’s coming next. Surely sending soldiers into war zones is a contravention of Health n Safety? You think that’s too fantastic? Well, perhaps, but I rule out nothing. After all, we live in a country where employers cannot advertise for ‘reliable workers’ because that would discriminate against unreliable workers; we live in a country where a senior police officer with a dubious record was effectively protected by institutional anti-racism; we live in a country where the police force and the fire service stand by and do nothing, trapped in a spreading web of Health n Safety.


  1. It is all about insurance and a sue happy public. A man attacks a policeman with an axe, the policeman has very little time to react, but he does and he shoots the man. The policeman was sued. He lost his job, his house, and finally his wife too.
    When people come to my property, and want to go for a walk in the forest, I have to explain first all the things that they must not do. Do not climb fences, stay out of farm buildings, stay away from the dam, do not walk into trees.
    There was a time when a group of friends could go camping for fun, and that was all there was to it. But now I am part of a trekking group, we have to have public liability insurance.
    This can cripple a club, even stop the club from forming in the first place. We reenact a colonial lifestyle in the 18th century, can you imagine having to have insurance to do what we do 300 years ago!!! I think it is about time that people took responsibility for their own actions, and if something needs doing to save someones life, then with all due care it should be done. I simply could not stand by and let someone die if I thought I could do something. One has to use common sense, look at the risks if you have the time and do whatever has to be done.
    Le Loup.

  2. How does one insure against Huron war parties? :-) Alas, Le Loup, we live in a cotton wool, compensation culture.

  3. yuck... after reading this all i could think about was that little girl in the car. people need to step out of health and safety system and act with in the moment when it comes to saving lives. here in the US and maybe every where... people are worried about being sued...about speaking up...believe that the 'system' they work within or parent within...or are educated within... is so concrete. how ridiculous and disturbing.

  4. that sucks. but then i think its not about these regulations. i think those people cared more about their jobs than saving those people. that is the sad bit. that a time has come when morality and conscience have lesser value than a steel pin. money out weight ideas, and its intentions. all those people could have saved those lives irrespective of those stupid laws but then didn't. what has to be seen is whether they would be able to live with them selves after being a part of inaction that resulted in the death of a person. a person they could had saved.